Drafts we labeled before running them, so the checker can be seen passing supported answers and not only failing the demo's one. Every number here came back from a real call.
Faithful: says exactly what the source says
The sample adds 'at the start of'. This one does not.
Your credit will be applied at the next billing cycle.
checked against: Account credits apply at the next billing cycle.
83%, sent as it is. We expected it to be sent.
Faithful: same claim, different words
Wording differs from the source, the claim does not.
Credits are applied on your next billing cycle.
checked against: Account credits apply at the next billing cycle.
82%, sent as it is. We expected it to be sent.
Faithful: less specific than the source
Drops a condition rather than adding one. Being vaguer is not being unsupported.
Refund requests are reviewed by our support team.
checked against: Refund requests made within 14 days of purchase are reviewed by our support team. (a different article from the sample above)
78%, sent as it is. We expected it to be sent.
Unsupported: adds a timing word
The demo's own case. The source never says 'at the start of'.
Your credit will be applied at the start of your next billing cycle.
checked against: Account credits apply at the next billing cycle.
13%, goes to a person. We expected it to go to a person.
Unsupported: contradicts the source
Invents a deadline the source does not give.
Your credit will be applied within 24 hours.
checked against: Account credits apply at the next billing cycle.
2%, goes to a person. We expected it to go to a person.
Unsupported: changes a number
Seven days against a source that says fourteen.
Refunds are reviewed within 7 days.
checked against: Refund requests made within 14 days of purchase are reviewed by our support team. (a different article from the sample above)
4%, goes to a person. We expected it to go to a person.